ReviewDisparity Logo
ReviewDisparity

Critics, outlets, and games against player sentiment

HomeNewsGamesJournalistsOutletsLeaderboardsCompareAbout
Review Signal

Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore
Browse gamesBrowse journalistsBrowse outletsCompare entities
Site
Dataset & methodologyPublishing principlesFAQTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

© 2026 ReviewDisparity. Independent review disparity tracking.

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

  1. Home/
  2. Journalists/
  3. Angel Davila
A

Angel Davila

66.0
Avg Score Given
-15.3
Steam Disparity
+1.4
MC Disparity
-8.0
Combined Disparity
37
Reviews
4 early (11%)22 launch window (59%)11 late (30%)

Scoring Pattern

20
Lowest Score
100
Highest Score
18.3
Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Gameblog

37 reviews

-8.0

Review summary

Updated Aug 30, 2026

Based on 37 scored reviews, Angel Davila gives games an average score of 66.0/100. Angel Davila scores games 15.3 points lower than Steam users and 1.4 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated
Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 37)+
  1. Layers of Fear 2viaGameblog
    Aug 1, 2019·Late review
    80/100View review
    Steam 71.7/100 · +8.3 ptsMetacritic 62/100 · +18.0 pts
  2. Yuppie PsychoviaGameblog
    Jul 17, 2019·Late review
    80/100View review
    Metacritic 83/100 · -3.0 pts
  3. CupheadviaGameblog
    Apr 24, 2019·Late review
    90/100View review
    Steam 96.2/100 · -6.2 ptsMetacritic 85/100 · +5.0 pts
  4. Eden-TomorrowviaGameblog
    Apr 14, 2019·Late review
    60/100View review
  5. TSIOQUEviaGameblog
    Mar 15, 2019·Late review
    60/100View review
    Steam 94.7/100 · -34.7 ptsMetacritic 82/100 · -22.0 pts

Reviews

Loading reviews...