Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Austin Wood - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Austin Wood

Austin Wood

79.2

Avg Score Given

-0.5

Steam Disparity

+9.6

MC Disparity

+3.1

Combined Disparity

Reviews

13 early (46%)13 launch window (46%)2 late (7%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

100

Highest Score

15.7

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

GamesRadar+

15 reviews

+7.9

GameZone

7 reviews

-9.8

PC Gamer

6 reviews

+1.8

Review summary

Updated Aug 28, 2026

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Based on 28 scored reviews, Austin Wood gives games an average score of 79.2/100. Austin Wood scores games 0.5 points lower than Steam users and 9.6 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 28)+

Monster Hunter WildsviaGamesRadar+
Feb 24, 2025Early review
90/100View review
Steam 49.1/100 · +40.9 ptsMetacritic 71/100 · +19.0 pts
Black Myth: WukongviaGamesRadar+
Aug 16, 2024Early review
80/100View review
Steam 96.5/100 · -16.5 ptsMetacritic 82/100 · -2.0 pts
Stellar BladeviaGamesRadar+
Apr 24, 2024Early review
70/100View review
Steam 93.7/100 · -23.7 ptsMetacritic 92/100 · -22.0 pts
Armored Core VI: Fires of RubiconviaGamesRadar+
Aug 23, 2023Early review
90/100View review
Steam 91.7/100 · -1.7 ptsMetacritic 81/100 · +9.0 pts
Destiny 2: The Witch QueenviaGamesRadar+
Mar 8, 2022Launch window
90/100View review
Steam 73.0/100 · +17.0 ptsMetacritic 78/100 · +12.0 pts