ReviewDisparity Logo
ReviewDisparity

Critics, outlets, and games against player sentiment

HomeNewsGamesJournalistsOutletsLeaderboardsCompareAbout
Review Signal

Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore
Browse gamesBrowse journalistsBrowse outletsCompare entities
Site
Dataset & methodologyPublishing principlesFAQTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

© 2026 ReviewDisparity. Independent review disparity tracking.

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

  1. Home/
  2. Journalists/
  3. Bruno de Carvalho
B

Bruno de Carvalho

74.5
Avg Score Given
-15.3
Steam Disparity
+1.8
MC Disparity
-6.8
Combined Disparity
11
Reviews
5 launch window (45%)6 late (55%)

Scoring Pattern

50
Lowest Score
90
Highest Score
11.3
Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Starbit

11 reviews

-6.8

Review summary

Updated Aug 30, 2026

Based on 11 scored reviews, Bruno de Carvalho gives games an average score of 74.5/100. Bruno de Carvalho scores games 15.3 points lower than Steam users and 1.8 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated
Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 11)+
  1. HelvetiiviaStarbit
    Feb 18, 2023·Launch window
    80/100View review
  2. River City Girls 2viaStarbit
    Jan 13, 2023·Launch window
    90/100View review
    Steam 85.4/100 · +4.6 ptsMetacritic 59/100 · +31.0 pts
  3. Beacon PinesviaStarbit
    Dec 30, 2022·Late review
    70/100View review
    Steam 97.6/100 · -27.6 ptsMetacritic 76/100 · -6.0 pts
  4. Kukoos: Lost PetsviaStarbit
    Dec 12, 2022·Launch window
    80/100View review
  5. Arise: A simple storyviaStarbit
    Sep 29, 2022·Late review
    80/100View review
    Steam 91.7/100 · -11.7 ptsMetacritic 77/100 · +3.0 pts

Reviews

Loading reviews...