Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Charles Blades - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Charles Blades

Charles Blades

67.5

Avg Score Given

-7.8

Steam Disparity

+6.9

MC Disparity

+4.6

Combined Disparity

Reviews

5 early (25%)15 launch window (75%)0 late (0%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

Highest Score

11.2

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Hardcore Gamer

10 reviews

+2.7

We Got This Covered

8 reviews

+8.1

GameSkinny

2 reviews

+0.5

Review summary

Updated

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Aug 29, 2026

Based on 20 scored reviews, Charles Blades gives games an average score of 67.5/100. Charles Blades scores games 7.8 points lower than Steam users and 6.9 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 20)+

Life is Strange 2 - Episode 1: RoadsviaGameSkinny
Sep 26, 2018Early review
60/100View review
Metacritic 65/100 · -5.0 pts
NHL 19viaGameSkinny
Sep 14, 2018Launch window
60/100View review
Metacritic 54/100 · +6.0 pts
Ni no Kuni 2: Revenant KingdomviaWe Got This Covered
Mar 27, 2018Launch window
80/100View review
Steam 83.6/100 · -3.6 ptsMetacritic 78/100 · +2.0 pts
Lost SphearviaWe Got This Covered
Feb 7, 2018Launch window
60/100View review
Steam 58.6/100 · +1.4 ptsMetacritic 66/100 · -6.0 pts
South Park: The Fractured But WholeviaWe Got This Covered
Oct 16, 2017Early review
80/100View review
Steam 85.1/100 · -5.1 ptsMetacritic 78/100 · +2.0 pts