Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Eduard Gafton - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Eduard Gafton

Eduard Gafton

73.2

Avg Score Given

-3.5

Steam Disparity

+1.6

MC Disparity

+0.9

Combined Disparity

Reviews

7 early (37%)11 launch window (58%)1 late (5%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

Highest Score

11.2

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

CGMagazine

16 reviews

+4.0

SmashPad

2 reviews

-15.7

Game Freaks 365

1 reviews

-16.0

Review summary

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Updated Oct 19, 2026

Based on 19 scored reviews, Eduard Gafton gives games an average score of 73.2/100. Eduard Gafton scores games 3.5 points lower than Steam users and 1.6 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 19)+

Ace Combat 8: Wings of TheveviaCGMagazine
Oct 2, 2026Launch window
80/100View review
Steam 83.8/100 · -3.8 ptsMetacritic 88/100 · -8.0 pts
Ace Combat 8: Wings of TheveviaCGMagazine
Sep 25, 2026Early review
80/100View review
Steam 83.8/100 · -3.8 ptsMetacritic 88/100 · -8.0 pts
Europa Universalis V: Fate Of The PhoenixviaCGMagazine
May 13, 2026Launch window
80/100View review
Steam 31.4/100 · +48.6 pts
Europa Universalis V: Fate Of The PhoenixviaCGMagazine
May 6, 2026Launch window
80/100View review
Steam 31.4/100 · +48.6 pts
Europa Universalis VviaCGMagazine
Oct 31, 2025Early review
80/100View review
Steam 66.5/100 · +13.4 ptsMetacritic 83/100 · -3.0 pts