ReviewDisparity Logo
ReviewDisparity

Critics, outlets, and games against player sentiment

HomeNewsGamesJournalistsOutletsLeaderboardsCompareAbout
Review Signal

Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore
Browse gamesBrowse journalistsBrowse outletsCompare entities
Site
Dataset & methodologyPublishing principlesFAQTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

© 2026 ReviewDisparity. Independent review disparity tracking.

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

  1. Home/
  2. Journalists/
  3. João Pardal
J

João Pardal

65.0
Avg Score Given
-17.1
Steam Disparity
+1.0
MC Disparity
-13.6
Combined Disparity
8
Reviews
4 launch window (50%)4 late (50%)

Scoring Pattern

40
Lowest Score
80
Highest Score
11.9
Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

FNintendo

8 reviews

-13.6

Review summary

Updated Aug 29, 2026

Based on 8 scored reviews, João Pardal gives games an average score of 65.0/100. João Pardal scores games 17.1 points lower than Steam users and 1.0 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated
Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 8)+
  1. Spirit RootsviaFNintendo
    Feb 14, 2020·Late review
    70/100View review
  2. Jamestown+viaFNintendo
    Dec 19, 2019·Late review
    70/100View review
    Steam 87.9/100 · -17.9 ptsMetacritic 75/100 · -5.0 pts
  3. PolyrollviaFNintendo
    Nov 27, 2019·Launch window
    60/100View review
    Steam 94.7/100 · -34.7 pts
  4. The Bradwell ConspiracyviaFNintendo
    Nov 11, 2019·Launch window
    40/100View review
    Steam 64.0/100 · -23.9 pts
  5. Ghostbusters: The Video Game RemasteredviaFNintendo
    Nov 7, 2019·Launch window
    70/100View review
    Steam 90.5/100 · -20.5 ptsMetacritic 71/100 · -1.0 pts

Reviews

Loading reviews...