ReviewDisparity Logo
ReviewDisparity

Critics, outlets, and games against player sentiment

HomeNewsGamesJournalistsOutletsLeaderboardsCompareAbout
Review Signal

Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore
Browse gamesBrowse journalistsBrowse outletsCompare entities
Site
Dataset & methodologyPublishing principlesFAQTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

© 2026 ReviewDisparity. Independent review disparity tracking.

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

  1. Home/
  2. Journalists/
  3. Michael Chow
M

Michael Chow

73.8
Avg Score Given
-6.3
Steam Disparity
+5.3
MC Disparity
-0.5
Combined Disparity
81
Reviews
8 early (10%)64 launch window (79%)9 late (11%)

Scoring Pattern

38
Lowest Score
95
Highest Score
11.0
Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

COGconnected

81 reviews

-0.5

Review summary

Updated Aug 29, 2026

Based on 81 scored reviews, Michael Chow gives games an average score of 73.8/100. Michael Chow scores games 6.3 points lower than Steam users and 5.3 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated
Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 81)+
  1. Bounty StarviaCOGconnected
    Nov 13, 2025·Launch window
    70/100View review
    Steam 62.7/100 · +7.3 pts
  2. Adventure of SamsaraviaCOGconnected
    Sep 11, 2025·Launch window
    85/100View review
    Steam 91.4/100 · -6.4 pts
  3. AbyssusviaCOGconnected
    Aug 17, 2025·Launch window
    75/100View review
    Steam 85.3/100 · -10.3 pts
  4. Tamagotchi PlazaviaCOGconnected
    Jul 17, 2025·Launch window
    50/100View review
  5. Blue PrinceviaCOGconnected
    Apr 20, 2025·Launch window
    95/100View review
    Steam 86.4/100 · +8.6 ptsMetacritic 77/100 · +18.0 pts

Reviews

Loading reviews...