Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Paweł Musiolik - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Paweł Musiolik

Paweł Musiolik

75.5

Avg Score Given

-2.4

Steam Disparity

+5.9

MC Disparity

+2.9

Combined Disparity

Reviews

25 early (27%)60 launch window (65%)7 late (8%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

100

Highest Score

13.8

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

NEOsite

62 reviews

+4.1

PPE.pl

24 reviews

-1.1

GRYOnline.pl

5 reviews

+5.3

Gamepressure

1 reviews

+10.8

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Review summary

Updated Aug 25, 2026

Based on 92 scored reviews, Paweł Musiolik gives games an average score of 75.5/100. Paweł Musiolik scores games 2.4 points lower than Steam users and 5.9 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 92)+

Legacy of Kain: AscendanceviaPPE.pl
Apr 3, 2026Launch window
30/100View review
Steam 28.6/100 · +1.4 ptsMetacritic 31/100 · -1.0 pts
Romeo is a Dead ManviaPPE.pl
Feb 10, 2026Early review
80/100View review
Steam 88.2/100 · -8.2 ptsMetacritic 78/100 · +2.0 pts
Hell Is UsviaPPE.pl
Sep 1, 2025Early review
80/100View review
Steam 85.2/100 · -5.2 ptsMetacritic 79/100 · +1.0 pts
Blades of FireviaPPE.pl
May 20, 2025Early review
55/100View review
Steam 76.1/100 · -21.1 ptsMetacritic 77/100 · -22.0 pts
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33viaPPE.pl
Apr 23, 2025Early review
85/100View review
Steam 95.3/100 · -10.3 ptsMetacritic 95/100 · -10.0 pts