Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Phillip Moyer - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Phillip Moyer

Phillip Moyer

66.3

Avg Score Given

-18.1

Steam Disparity

-1.8

MC Disparity

-8.7

Combined Disparity

Reviews

3 launch window (50%)3 late (50%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

Highest Score

13.3

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Worth Playing

6 reviews

-8.7

Review summary

Updated Aug 28, 2026

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Based on 6 scored reviews, Phillip Moyer gives games an average score of 66.3/100. Phillip Moyer scores games 18.1 points lower than Steam users and 1.8 points lower than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 6)+

Kingdoms and CastlesviaWorth Playing
Aug 16, 2018Late review
67/100View review
Steam 93.5/100 · -26.5 ptsMetacritic 72/100 · -5.0 pts
Gang BeastsviaWorth Playing
Jun 27, 2018Late review
70/100View review
Steam 85.6/100 · -15.6 ptsMetacritic 68/100 · +2.0 pts
Apollo Justice: Ace AttorneyviaWorth Playing
May 11, 2018Late review
72/100View review
Metacritic 80/100 · -8.0 pts
ExtinctionviaWorth Playing
Apr 17, 2018Launch window
42/100View review
Fable FortuneviaWorth Playing
Apr 10, 2018Launch window
65/100View review