Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Phillip Tinner - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Phillip Tinner

Phillip Tinner

60.9

Avg Score Given

-15.5

Steam Disparity

-3.6

MC Disparity

-10.2

Combined Disparity

Reviews

3 early (13%)19 launch window (83%)1 late (4%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

Highest Score

18.6

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Screen Rant

23 reviews

-10.2

Review summary

Updated Aug 30, 2026

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Based on 23 scored reviews, Phillip Tinner gives games an average score of 60.9/100. Phillip Tinner scores games 15.5 points lower than Steam users and 3.6 points lower than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 23)+

Back 4 BloodviaScreen Rant
Oct 11, 2021Early review
70/100View review
Steam 68.8/100 · +1.2 ptsMetacritic 53/100 · +17.0 pts
Cannibal CuisineviaScreen Rant
Jul 8, 2020Late review
50/100View review
Steam 83.2/100 · -33.2 pts
Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide ClassicsviaScreen Rant
Jul 8, 2020Launch window
80/100View review
Metacritic 77/100 · +3.0 pts
Fort TriumphviaScreen Rant
Apr 27, 2020Launch window
90/100View review
Steam 79.2/100 · +10.8 ptsMetacritic 78/100 · +12.0 pts
MokokoviaScreen Rant
Feb 24, 2020Launch window
40/100View review