ReviewDisparity Logo
ReviewDisparity

Critics, outlets, and games against player sentiment

HomeNewsGamesJournalistsOutletsLeaderboardsCompareAbout
Review Signal

Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore
Browse gamesBrowse journalistsBrowse outletsCompare entities
Site
Dataset & methodologyPublishing principlesFAQTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

© 2026 ReviewDisparity. Independent review disparity tracking.

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

  1. Home/
  2. Journalists/
  3. Raymond Herrera
R

Raymond Herrera

75.7
Avg Score Given
-5.8
Steam Disparity
+6.7
MC Disparity
+3.7
Combined Disparity
3
Reviews
1 early (33%)2 launch window (67%)0 late (0%)

Scoring Pattern

68
Lowest Score
81
Highest Score
6.8
Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Low score spread detected. This reviewer may use a narrow scoring range or binary scoring system.

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Marooners' Rock

3 reviews

+3.7

Review summary

Updated Oct 19, 2026

Based on 3 scored reviews, Raymond Herrera gives games an average score of 75.7/100. Raymond Herrera scores games 5.8 points lower than Steam users and 6.7 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated
Sources behind this summary(3 recent of 3)+
  1. Cyberdimension Neptunia: 4 Goddesses OnlineviaMarooners' Rock
    Oct 9, 2017·Early review
    68/100View review
    Steam 87.2/100 · -19.2 ptsMetacritic 71/100 · -3.0 pts
  2. Marvel Heroes Omega (Console Edition)viaMarooners' Rock
    Aug 2, 2017·Launch window
    81/100View review
    Metacritic 67/100 · +14.0 pts
  3. Torment: Tides of NumeneraviaMarooners' Rock
    Mar 1, 2017·Launch window
    78/100View review
    Steam 70.4/100 · +7.6 ptsMetacritic 69/100 · +9.0 pts

Reviews

Loading reviews...