Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Worth Playing Staff - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Journalists
Worth Playing Staff

Worth Playing Staff

82.3

Avg Score Given

-3.6

Steam Disparity

+5.7

MC Disparity

+0.3

Combined Disparity

Reviews

3 early (14%)8 launch window (36%)11 late (50%)

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

Highest Score

11.5

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Disparity by Outlet

The journalist's average disparity score per outlet

Worth Playing

22 reviews

+0.3

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Review summary

Updated Aug 28, 2026

Based on 22 scored reviews, Worth Playing Staff gives games an average score of 82.3/100. Worth Playing Staff scores games 3.6 points lower than Steam users and 5.7 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 22)+

ForestrikeviaWorth Playing
Nov 18, 2025Launch window
80/100View review
Steam 92.0/100 · -11.9 pts
Hitman 3viaWorth Playing
Jan 31, 2022Late review
68/100View review
Metacritic 79/100 · -11.0 pts
Pecaminosa - A Pixel Noir GameviaWorth Playing
Oct 20, 2021Late review
70/100View review
HumankindviaWorth Playing
Sep 28, 2021Launch window
95/100View review
Steam 69.1/100 · +25.9 ptsMetacritic 67/100 · +28.0 pts
Dragon Ball Z: KakarotviaWorth Playing
Sep 23, 2021Late review
80/100View review
Steam 93.2/100 · -13.2 ptsMetacritic 80/100 · 0.0 pts