Keep the data honest.

ReviewDisparity tracks how critics, outlets, and games compare with player opinion across Steam and Metacritic. The goal is simple: make disagreement visible instead of burying it in scattered scorecards.

Explore

Browse games Browse journalists Browse outlets Compare entities

Site

Dataset & methodology Publishing principles FAQ Terms of Service Privacy Policy

Data sourced from publicly available information on OpenCritic, Steam, and Metacritic. ReviewDisparity is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those services.

Washington Post - Review Scores & Disparity | ReviewDisparity

Home
Outlets
Washington Post

Washington Post

Total Reviews

Journalists

88.3

Average Score

Disparity Breakdown

Steam Disparity

+2.4

Metacritic Disparity

+13.1

Combined Disparity

+9.2

Average of both sources

Scoring Pattern

Lowest Score

100

Highest Score

9.8

Score Spread(variance in their own scores)

Low score spread detected. This outlet may use a narrow scoring range or binary scoring system.

Review Timing

12 early (55%)9 launch window (41%)1 late (5%)

Reviews

Loading reviews...

Review summary

Updated Oct 22, 2025

Based on 22 scored reviews, Washington Post gives games an average score of 88.3/100. Washington Post scores games 2.4 points higher than Steam users and 13.1 points higher than Metacritic users.

How these comparisons are calculated

Sources behind this summary(5 recent of 22)+

Hollow Knight: SilksongbyGene Park
Oct 22, 2025Launch window
100/100View review
Steam 89.4/100 · +10.6 ptsMetacritic 89/100 · +11.0 pts
Silent Hill fbyGene Park
Oct 20, 2025Launch window
100/100View review
Steam 80.5/100 · +19.5 ptsMetacritic 67/100 · +33.0 pts
Donkey Kong BananzabyGene Park
Jul 16, 2025Early review
100/100View review
Metacritic 89/100 · +11.0 pts
Death Stranding 2: On the BeachbyGene Park
Jun 23, 2025Early review
100/100View review
Steam 95.2/100 · +4.8 ptsMetacritic 87/100 · +13.0 pts
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33byGene Park
Apr 23, 2025Early review
88/100View review
Steam 95.3/100 · -7.3 ptsMetacritic 95/100 · -7.0 pts